User talk:198.240.130.75

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Stewart Adcock 30 June 2005 15:56 (UTC)

This is the english wikipedia. Please use english here. I'm not sure what language that was, but there is probably a wikipedia for it. --Phroziac (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry. There were so many long non-english names in that article that I thought it wasn't in english. I was referring to Maulana Ibne Hasan Nonaharvi. Oh yeah, and...

Welcome!

Hello, 198.240.130.75, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Phroziac (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blocked

This IP is blocked for 24 hours for continued vandalism. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] warned

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ragib 22:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] January 2006

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Bill 20:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2006

Thank you for your contributions to July 3. However, it is not notable and has been reverted. — nathanrdotcom (TCW) 20:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Battlefield Earth on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Pet. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Trysha (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Insurable interest is only required to be established at issue for a life insurance policy. The fact that a policy purchaser does not have an insurable interest as you noted in your revision of life settlement is in fact not relevant to the sale of a life insurance policy to a third party. The article has been reverted to the previous version.

[edit] Your edit to Randy Scheunemann

Your recent edit to Randy Scheunemann was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome== ==Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. Waggers 21:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Langdon

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Langdon. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. JFreeman 17:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Harvard University

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Srose (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Image:KANKstill.jpg on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shane (talk/contrib) 01:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Teaneck, New Jersey. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 20:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] String theory

Hi there. Thanks for your question, and I apologize for not explaining this better immediately. First, the tone of what you wrote was as a persuasive essay, whereas that section should have a neutral description of criticisms from other sources; see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, one of our core policies. Second, it's important to remember that Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, is a secondary source. That means we describe the analyses of others, we don't do our own; see Wikipedia:No original research. I think that should give you a stard on understanding the issues. Now if someone has published a criticism like the one you make above, it would certainly be ok to describe that criticism, citing a reliable source. -- SCZenz 16:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Polymath

It seems you have much to add to the debate, but please do keep it civil. --Dweller 20:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)