User talk:198.187.154.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Unsigned Comments

Hi User 198.187.154.33 from Rogers State College, thanks for your contributions to wikipedia. Wikipedia has few rules or guidelines. One guideline is that comments should be signed on talk pages see WP:Sig. This does not require you to get an account, it will simply make the talk page a little more readable for others trying to follow the conversation. Since you seem to enjoy wikipedia, consider getting a user account, which will allow you to take credit for your work and make communcation easier. Best wishes, and if you have any questions, ask on Wikipedia:Help desk or just leave a note on my talk page. Yours, --Paul E. Ester 00:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for experimenting with the page Talk:List of people from Tulsa, Oklahoma on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Adambiswanger1 17:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Protestant Reformation on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Big Smooth 15:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. CRCulver 19:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. CRCulver 21:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

This is not spam, I am not advertising, There is no money involved. Dont tell me what this is, so leave it be.

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. CRCulver 00:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

You keep adding a link to a commercial website where people must buy a book to participate. This is linkspam. CRCulver 04:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Andeh 03:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reinsertion of vandalism into Talk:Tulsa, Oklahoma

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:Tulsa, Oklahoma, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --LeflymanTalk 19:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

No one is vandalizing, this is merely a copy of what the vandals wrote.

And how exactly is re-posting "a copy of what the vandals wrote" different from the inital vandalism? Derogatory comments such as those you re-inserted are not appropriate to article talk pages. If you want to slag a community, do it on another site. --LeflymanTalk 20:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Because it is a quote, I didnt say it, you cant say I said it, because I only quoted the vandal, thus making me not the vandal.

[edit] Article talk pages

Article talk pages are for discussing the article...not the subject of the article. All of your talk page contributions are better suited for an internet blog or chat room.(of which there are thousands to choose from. Read Wikipedia policy WP:NOT sectio 1.6 - Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. You can also read Wikipedia policy WP:TALK which further explains talk page etiquette. The pages you are posting on have talk page headers which also explain the rules quite clearly. If you want to start a chat or conversation...it will be removed. If you have any policy question, by all means ask me. I will try to help, or direct you to where you can get help. Anger22 23:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

PS, your BB King link was good...but you should have just added it to the main article as a citation rather than stick it on the talk page. I copied it into the main article for you. You've added alot of "Django influence links" onto Django's article talk page. Instead of putting them there they should be added into the article itself. The more citations the better(although a couple of your links say nothing about Django) Read Wikipedia policy WP:CITE to learn more about adding references. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. Anger22 00:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)