User talk:195.70.32.136

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] ISP Info

inetnum:      195.70.32.0 - 195.70.32.255
netname:      INTERWARE
descr:        InterWare Inc.
country:      HU
admin-c:      IWNA1-RIPE
tech-c:       IWNA1-RIPE
rev-srv:      ns1.interware.hu
rev-srv:      ns2.interware.hu
status:       ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by:       AS8358-MNT
source:       RIPE # Filtered

role:           InterWare Network Administration
address:        InterWare Inc.
address:        Victor Hugo u. 18-22.
address:        H-1132 Budapest
address:        Hungary
phone:          +36 1 4525300
fax-no:         +36 1 4525301
e-mail:         net-admin@interware.hu
admin-c:        LN777-RIPE
tech-c:         LN777-RIPE
tech-c:         ZA183-RIPE
nic-hdl:        IWNA1-RIPE
mnt-by:         AS8358-MNT
remarks:        ---------------------------------------------
remarks:        Please send all abuse and spam complaints to:
remarks:        abuse@interware.hu
remarks:        ---------------------------------------------
source:         RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to '195.70.32.0/19AS8358'

route:        195.70.32.0/19
descr:        InterWare Inc.
descr:        HU
origin:       AS8358
mnt-by:       AS8358-MNT
source:       RIPE # Filtered

[edit] December 2005

Can you chill out with the personal attacks and inflamatory language? Swear words and the like are not appropriate for Wikipedia, even on talk pages and edit summaries. See Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. — ceejayoz talk 17:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

You might be interested in my answer to your comment on Talk:InterCity Express before you continue your rants on other pages --Qualle (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Please observe that the articles' talk pages are not apropriate places for your personal opinions on the world in general, see Talk:Organ transplant --Ekko 12:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Hi there. I blocked you for your inflammatory language on article talk pages. I think you misunderstand, or do not care, what this project is about. If you'd like to contribute to our encyclopedia project, please feel free to. But posting opinions on talk pages in which you make all sorts of claims about blood and vengeance doesn't help anybody. So I've blocked you for a couple days. Keep it up and you'll get blocked longer. --Fastfission 00:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Genre SF & Fantasy

Thanks for your comments on the genre issue - please try to tone down a bit and as this all about helping - you could try correcting Novel article to the correct genre as you genuinely identify the error. Thanks :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 19:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment in Talk:Dale Begg-Smith

Your comments in Talk:Dale Begg-Smith [1] were unhelpful. Wikipedia is not a place for the expression of opinions (even in talk pages). Expressing negative allegations as fact rather than allegations (even in a talk page) might also put wikipedia at risk of litigation. Thanks, Andjam 11:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments in Talk:Spree killer

I have posted a response to your post of 15 February 2006 on Wikipedia's Talk:Spree killer page, i.e., "Biased vocabulary." Once again, you have posted inappropriate, inflammatory statements which do nothing to further discussion on the topic. The intent of your message is to discredit another writer for using biased vocabulary, as you contend spree killings are not used to justify stricter gun control policies and legislation in countries outside the United States of America. You hold that Wikipedia is not an American encyclopedia and, as such, American-biased vocabulary should not be used. However, in so doing, you have only discredited yourself.

Wikipedia's spree killer list includes perpetrators from countries outside the US - such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England and Scotland - where anti-gun lobbyists have indeed cited these incidents in making arguments for stricter gun control laws and have been successful in their efforts. Relevant links are provided for your reference. In future, please do your homework before using Wikipedia as a soapbox for your blatant anti-Americanism which, in itself, is highly biased. Incidentally, I am a Canadian living in Canada and I am grateful that firearms are strictly controlled in my country.

Jay Black, Vancouver

[edit] Wikipedia is not a Soapbox

Please stop posting rants on article talk pages. Talk pages are for discussions about changes in articles and inflammatory rants with no connection to the article itself are not welcome. --Fastfission 13:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Negative opinion in Talk pages

Talk pages are not chatrooms, and Wikipedia has no use for disparaging comments about random subjects you wish to share your opinion on. As such, I removed the offending portion of your comments from Talk:Moomin.

You should also sign your comments. This can automatically be accomplished by placing four tildes (~~~~) into your edits where you wish your signature to appear. — Saxifrage ✎ 16:42, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mac OS X talk page

Your comments on Talk:Mac OS X were not constructive to the discussion about the article. Please realise that Wikipedia is not a soapbox.

--BDWill Talk Contribs 14:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talks

Stop it! This is encyclopedia, not a forum to express your personal opinion. If you oppose some specific statement comment on the laconicaly. No one is interested in your political agenda. -- tasc talkdeeds 20:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia is not a soapbox

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Your edit [2] to Talk:Hutt River Province Principality was merely an inflammatory expression of opinion rather than a discussion about the article. Andjam 11:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Encyclopedia

Hi, I see this IP address is being used almost entirely to leave personal opinions on talk pages. WP is an encyclopedia and the talk pages are for contributors to discuss their edits. If you want to join us in doing that, you're most welcome, but if not, please don't use the website for your personal purposes. If it continues, you may be blocked from editing. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 03:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final soapbox warning.

This is your last warning. The next time you abuse Wikipedia talk pages as your personal soapbox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further warning. Sandstein 12:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

You would be blocking the webproxy of a large ISP, tens of thousands of people.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

Raul654 15:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


HAHAHA! Pwned. Haizum 22:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Seconded!--Planetary 09:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Psychoactive Drug / Ulysses reference

Interesting comment(s), but you should note that drug use has been a staple of civilization for all of recorded history, and most certainly for many millenia prior. Nothing is going to change this as can be seen from our modern dependence not only on a large pharmacopeia of pills, but also on copius amounts of coffee, tea, chocolate and alcohol.

As far as modern technology, much has been inspired from drug use, in fact a large amount of the technology boom in the late 60s and early 70s have roots in psychedelic drugs such as LSD. --Thoric 02:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Veneration

Thanks for the vandalism alert on Veneration - but why not fix it yourself? Thanks, NawlinWiki 16:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you abuse Wikipedia talk pages as your personal soapbox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further warning. Please note that you have been warned before on this issue. CoolGuy 16:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. WP is not a blog or a soapbox. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. ←Humus sapiens ну? 19:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
To user 195.70.32.136, I will be watching to make sure that your edits contribute to the Wikipedia community, as I am sure you have that potential, and also to ensure that you do not continue to use the discussion pages to make racist remarks. Remember, Wikipedia is supposed to have a neutral point of view, which means that any facts, even those that are unpopular, may be included in articles, though we are all working to provide information based on verifiable facts. CoolGuy 01:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
The IP is a webproxy of a large ISP. BTW, the entire wikipedia is very racist, because the majority of its contributors are americans and american people are mind-washed by pro-israel media and so they contribute biased articles to favor jews. The whole world is crying over Iran refining when Israel has 220 nukes from Dimona. The amount of palestinian dead is more than 3x than israeli dead, but Israel is always self-defence and palestinians are always terorists when you read Wikipedia.
It's strange that this IP supposedly belongs to a large ISP's proxy but the only contributions that ever come from this IP are infalmmatory comments on Talk pages... IMHO this IP should've been permanently blocked a long time ago. And no, I'm neither American nor jewish - I happen to disagree with a lot of US-american and israeli politival decisions. But still, I think the vast majority of your comments are way outside the line.
It might be helpful to actually read the articles you are commenting on. It would be even better, if you read replies to your arguments and reacted to them. Otherwise your behavior will be seen as trolling--Qualle (talk) 11:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
All his/her comments are outside the line. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a message board. CoolGuy 15:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Using Wikipedia as a soapbox or like an opinion blog is not OK. My encounter with this user's POV. --clearthought 22:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Warning 2

This is your last warning. The next time you abuse Wikipedia talk pages as your personal soapbox, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further warning. Please note that you have been warned before on this issue. CoolGuy 16:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

BTW - I am in the process of removing the comments that are not related to the the goals of Wikipedia. CoolGuy 04:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Supershadow

He's a fraud, my friend. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 08:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Using wikipedia as a blog - September

[edit] Your comments in Talk:Osama bin Laden

Asking for a uglier picture of Osama is trolling. I've noticed that you've also been using other talk pages as a blog. Andjam 10:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

And now you're commenting on picture quality in Adolf Hitler. Andjam 11:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

In essence, Andjam and I are asking you to stop trolling. Please see the list of what Wikipedia is not. If you continue, you can be blocked for this. Thanks. -ZsinjTalk 12:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trolling

Wikipedia is not your soapbox. Do this again and you will be banned. Yandman 13:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/5/User_talk%7E195.70.32.136.html"