User talk:192.249.47.9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Attention:


This IP address, 192.249.47.9, is registered to United Technologies Research Center and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Remember to always substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] December 2005

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.--TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 19:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
  2. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- JHCC (talk) 19:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] February 2006

  1. Stop blanking text because of "Lorraine's retirement". 68.39.174.238 19:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

The SI units named after someone are spelled in lowercase (see the yellow box in the article Hertz). Regards -- CyrilB 15:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refer to [1]. Units named after a person are not capitalized. -- CyrilB 14:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. --W.marsh 17:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --digital_me(t/c) 19:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Choess 22:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Features new to Windows Vista

Your recent edit to Features new to Windows Vista was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antikythera mechanism

Its discovery was without a doubt the most important thing to come out of the whole wreck exploration, as the article authored by Price advocated profound changes at existing scientific opinion. Price commented also on its significance more than once. Look at what Arthur C.Clarke had to say about it: "Though it is over two thousand years old, it represents a level which our technology did not reach until the eighteenth century. If the insight of the Greeks had matched their ingenuity, the industrial revolution might have begun a thousand years before Columbus. By this time we would not merely be puttering around on the Moon, we would have reached the nearer stars."-- Arthur C. Clarke in "Technology and the Limits of Knowledge".I am not familiar with the POV enough to know if this breached it, but i dont think the statement "most important discovery of the wreck" was out of place there.

All the other POV's (except one) were not mine(check the history if you want), so i wasnt trying to convince anyone.You could argue that I left them unedited, but i dont know NPOV very well, actually. Neverheless, I'll leave the changes, as they were well meant.

On another note, this NPOV is sometimes a harness, I feel. Not much experience editing WP and I am aware of its necessity sometimes, but articles become dry this way. A literary style does have its uses, even on an encyclopedia.

But i will end with this: This project, WP, is simply awesome and its ideals are as noble as can be. I admire all of those wikipedians, doing what they do, even if sometimes i dont agree with someones. A big "thank you" to the fellow human on the other end of this screen.

[edit] WordPress

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to WordPress, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Computerjoe's talk 19:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Maria Bartiromo

Whilst your edit was valid, please refrain from personal attacks in the edit summary- try to remain civil to other users even if their mistakes and edits are to you painfully silly or you disagree with them.

Happy editing.

EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 14:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

It's nice that the two people you mentioned in this edit are so in love, but Wikipedia is not the place to announce that. Thanks. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 18:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Seriously. Wikipedia is not the place to announce relationships. What you are doing is considered vandalism. Please stop. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 18:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 31

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hojatoleslam on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 18:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Jim Doyle

Your recent edit to Jim Doyle (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/9/2/User_talk%7E192.249.47.9.html"