User talk:163.139.215.193

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Azuki

Conversation moved to Talk:Azuki bean#Japanese names.

[edit] Sumomo

I've quickly knocked together this page, if you want to look and improve it.

[edit] Copyvio catch

Thanks for catching the copyright violation at Ameya Alley Market. -- Kjkolb 03:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yuzu

If Chinese 柚子 is pomelo, not yuzu, then what is the Chinese name for what is called yuzu in Japanese (and which apparently originally came from China, and still grows wild in some parts of China, but is generally not grown commercially there)? And why do Japanese use the characters for pomelo to describe their yuzu? This is all important to discuss instead of/before just removing interwikis from the article. Badagnani 19:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Shogakukan's Chinese-Japanese dictionary says Chinese "香橙" means yuzu and "柚子" means pomelo. Shogakukan's Japanese-Chinese dictionary says yuzu is "柚" or "柚子" in Chinese. Sanseido's Daily Concise C-J says Chinese "香橙" means daidai and "柚" means pomelo. Sanseido's J-C says yuzu is "柚" or "柚子" in Chinese. Gakken's kanji dictionary says "柚" now refers to pomelo and Japanese name "yuzu" came from "柚子". Heibonsha World Encyclopedia says Chinese "柚" now refers to pomelo. --163.139.215.193 13:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mudan

If you're going to "fix" the species names in one article, you ought to do it consistently as the articles on rockii don't agree. But it would also be good if you provide sources. The way we had it had already been checked. Badagnani 10:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

See Talk:Paeonia lactiflora for a source. Feel free to contact me if you need more information. Thank you. --163.139.215.193 13:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cafe Alpha logo

Hi, you said the use of the Café Alpha logo was unfair. However, it satisfies all Wikipedia:Fair use criteria.

  1. No free equivalent of the logo is available at this time.
  2. Use of this logo would not prevent sales of the manga.
  3. Shrunken from 6000x4000 to 256x172 for safety.
  4. A different sized version, again shrunken from the original, was previously in use at Café Alpha. The original images were previously published in the manga.
  5. It is high-quality and aethistically pleasing for inclusion in an encyclopedia, despite its small size, and is not merely decorational.
  6. It is not known to violate any policy.
  7. It is currently in use at YKK.
  8. It identifies Café Alpha, the setting for a significant number of YKK episodes.
  9. It is only used in the article namespace.
  10. Also,
    • It attributes all people who contributed to the image.
    • It uses an appropriate fair use tag.
    • A fair use rationale is attached.

If you mean that people should have no right to create secondary works, I disagree. "Creativity always builds on the past." --Kjoonlee 18:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Ammended. --Kjoonlee 06:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the great picture. But I would suggest you replace the picture to Ashinano's own, unmodified version and then you will not have to explain why the unauthorized alteration is needed for the article. Still you will have to give a good reason why you need to use the "logo" as part of the article. If there is anything I can do to help, please don't hesitate to ask. Thank you. --163.139.215.193 14:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright issue

Look, often image names contain the name of the show. When it is that obvious its really reduddent to mention it. --Cat out 15:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for providing some source information on Image:Urd (Oh My Goddess!).png. I'm sure you can also provide the name of the copyright holders for its own image description page. Release date and/or episode number would also be helpful. If you need some help, please ask. --163.139.215.193 13:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Do not thank me, I provided the obvious. I do not need to provide the name of the copyright holder. Dude its a TV screenshot from a spesific anime, I was nice enough to put the anime title on the image title as well. Don't overdo the copyright issues. --Cat out 01:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No source info?

I've noticed with Image:Nadia-Sanson001.png and Image:Nadia-Grandis003.png and possibly others, you've tagged it with no source info, but the image description has "This screenshot was taken by Federico Pistono from the original DVD." and it's tagged as tv-screenshot, so what source info beyond that should be added for those with the same image description? TransUtopian 18:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. At least there should be proper attribution:
  • Who created this image?
  • Who owns the copyright to this image?
See Wikipedia:Image use policy, Wikipedia:Image description page and Wikipedia:Fair use for more information. --163.139.215.193 15:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Those are not source issues, you need to use the correct tags. -- Ned Scott 12:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Whats up?

A qucik review of your contribs show you mass tag images for deletion with various reasons... Most notably a lack of source or citation of the creator etc. Please dont overdo it. You should definately NOT revert war over tagging.

I'd like to note, each fair use upload does not require an essay. Wikipedia editors often take screenshots of anime and etc. Please see: WP:AGF.

--Cat out 01:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for advice. --163.139.215.193 15:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/6/3/User_talk%7E163.139.215.193.html"