User talk:160.111.254.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 160.111.254.11, is registered to Smithsonian Institution and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Smithsonian Institution to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. Jarlaxle June 28, 2005 19:45 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your links to the Smithsonian

You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:External links. In general, we would rather have content added to our articles than links to articles, even very good ones. Consider that what we are trying to accomplish here is an encyclopedia, not a collection of good links on a subject. If you start adding links to many articles, it will give the appearance of link-spamming: using wikipedia links to increase traffic to your site.

That said, we would gladly welcome your textual additions to our articles! -- Mwanner | Talk 22:13, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

On the other hand (he said, having just stumbled across another user's addition of a Smithsonian link), if the Smithsonian piece is on a specialised topic that we have no article covering that relates to the article to which it is added, the external link becomes more defensible.
In short, done with the above concerns in mind, you could probably add a number of links that would be a real addition to the project. Just be aware that we get a lot of spamming, and some of us are inclined to get cranky about it. -- Mwanner | Talk 22:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment at Talk:Portrait

Thank you for your suggestion regarding Portrait! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Sandstein 05:06, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Why is our nation's finest institute spamming Wikipedia? This is completely bizarre and I'm looking forward to an explanation. Knowmoore 07:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Stop removing sourced information from articles. You are about to violate Wikipedia:3RR on Mala Prespa and Golo Bardo and if you continue reverting you might be blocked.   /FunkyFly.talk_  16:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Euthymios 16:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)