User talk:132.33.132.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This user or user talk page has been temporarily protected from editing by new or unregistered users to prevent blocked users from removing warnings or introducing vandalism to it. (Administrators, please remember to add the user to Wikipedia:List of protected pages/User pages.)

Contents

Administrators: Please keep any blocks short (15 min-1 hr) only as absolutely necessary.

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 132.33.132.19, is registered to Travis Air Force Base and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Travis Air Force Base to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.


RAP SHEET:

Warning!

Your recent contribution to {{{1}}} is vandalism. Further contributions in this manner will result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned. savidan(talk) (e@) 05:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Bill O'Reilly controversies

Hello! You keep adding an "IQ" sub-section to this article. While the story may very well be true, the link/citation you provided goes nowhere, and I was unable to substantiate anything via a quick Google search. Please provide a citation with a link to a reliable source so the details can be verified. Thanks!Hal Raglan 21:18, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Stop Vandalizing or you'll be banned

Quit vandalizing articles or you'll be banned from Wikipedia.--134.210.83.146 22:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

April 2006

  1. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Canaanite religion. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bill O'Reilly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MyNameIsNotBob 07:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

1 May 2006

Pleas refrain from using insulting language like 'asshole' to editors. Thanks--Light current 18:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 22:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Reblocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Infrogmation 18:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

gramophone record

Please stop attempting to change this article's title to "analogue record" unilaterally. Simple re-submitting the change over and over won't work and it is annoying. Many people negotiated for a long time to come up with the current title. If you feel strongly about it, a more productive way to work would be to re-open the debate on Talk:gramophone record. zowie 21:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. - sorry, rest of Travis Air Force Base. - DavidWBrooks 21:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing gramophone record as you did again today. zowie 17:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

1. Someone vandalized the title and I fixed it. Stop unilaterally telling me to stop changing the page. 2.) Why is "Again" in quotation marks? Quotations marks are for quoting someone; see previous sentence. --132.33.132.19

Actually, no, the title was agreed upon by many people over a long time and after much discussion. If you'd like to change it, the more effective (and less annoying) way to do so is to open a discussion on the Talk page. You might say something like "Gramophone record is, in my opinion, not a correct title for this page" and go from there. The rest of the community would like to work with you and to discuss your concern.
If you decide to do that (and I hope you do) you will do well to sign up for a user account. You'll get more respect that way, and won't be confused with everyone else accessing the web from Travis Air Force Base. zowie 18:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I should have mentioned it explicityly before - you can see the history of the gramophone/analogue debate at Talk:Gramophone record/Archive2. zowie 18:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry to hear it. The joy of writing an encyclopedia is collaboration with others. zowie 21:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry that you can't refrain from selfish editing. That's too bad. If you continue to try to thwart the consensus of the group, we can block you from editing the specific article in question. --Blainster 07:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Great.

"Your IP address is 132.33.132.19. Please include this address, along with your username (if you are a registered user), in any queries you make.

You can email DavidWBrooks or one of the other administrators to discuss the block."

But when I try to email him...

"You must be logged in and have a valid authenticated e-mail address in your preferences to send e-mail to other users. "

The wording, "if you are a registered user," indicates you don't have to be registered in order to email the Admins.

{{unblock|Don't get discouraged by some kids on this I.P.}}

Done --pgk(talk) 07:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

AK-47

Stop inserting the link to the AK-47 article. You will be blocked if it happens again. The article you link to commences, "Semi-automatic AK-47's were available for purchase in Canada with nothing more than an FAC (Firearm Aquisition Certificate) up until 1992. This was the year a fascist hag named Kim Campbell was used as a sacrificial cow to railroad freedom-robbing gun legislation (Bill C-17) into place." This is inappropriate material to link to. Stop now. The Land 20:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked. If you are innocently using this account and find yourself blocked accidentally as a result, please see the instructions at the top of the page; create an account and request unblocking. The Land 20:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Unblock

User "The Land" has blocked me for "offensive vandalism." In fact, I kept posting a link on the AK-47 page discussing a controversial sunject (please see the newest post in the discussion page.)

{{unblock|I'd like to discuss the situation with a neutral moderator.}} --132.33.132.19

It appears you have been edit warring rather than constructively trying to resolve disputes. This is not tolerated. As TheLand notes above the link you were inserting appears on it's face to be inappropriate. Additionally please see wikipedia is not an instruction manual, the link you provide is not contributing encyclopaedic knowledge about the subject. Thanks. -pgk(talk) 21:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Indeed. I blocked you because you were repeatedly adding inappropriate content and because your response to advice and warnings was to threaten other users. That's not acceptable here. The Land 21:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

My main complaint is the grounds that this has been objected to. One person says it should not be posted because modifying the rifle in that manner is illegal, and illegal activities do not belong on Wikipedia, nor should they be described here. If that is the case, then what is [this] doing on here?

The other complaint I have received is that there is no legitimate reason for civilians to modify a weapon this way. This is a biased statement.

The linked article is opinionated, certainly. I felt that the main subject it disussed was relevant, however. Perhaps I should re-write the article which is being linked to. If I changed it enough to avoid plagiarism and left out all bias, would there then still be grounds for complaint? --132.33.132.19

See wikipedia is not an instruction manual and no original research it is unlikely that a rewrite will be able to get beyond those two. --pgk(talk) 22:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

I am not making an instruction manual, I am going to discuss a relevent matter of the subject. As far as instruction manuals go, there is already a [picture] of one in the article! I understand the two can streamline in certain areas, though they are never the same. Now for the "Original research" issue. Why would there be a problem in my using the linked article in the bibliography section?

Unblock Denied.

{{unblock|I hardly see how telling someone that I reported them to moderators is "threatening." Please read my response to my detractor's acusations in the "Unblock" section of my discussion page.}} --[[User:132.33.132.19|132.33.132.19

Denied, I'm not unblocking anyone who thinks that telling users to "Eat shit" [1] is constructive dialogue. Calm down and come back tomorrow with a cooler head. And don't add the unblock template again or this page will be protected. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Gramophone Record (again)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop vandalizing Gramophone record. zowie 21:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)]]

Blocked for a long while

I've blocked you again. Anyone reviewing: Check the user contributions. The only contribs from this account for a while have been from one troller who has already been blocked for this and shows no sign of improving his vehaviour, so I have imposed a relatively lengthy block and disregarded the fact it's a shared IP. The Land 22:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Well, if you come back after amont hand keep behaving the same way, the blocks will only get longer. The Land 22:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Unblock request

{

I'm sorry, but please talk to your system administrators about finding and stopping the vandal first. Shell babelfish 11:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 04:23, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Unblock denied. Personal attacks even waiting for unblock. I guess, if you found an error, you can disclose the matter on your talk page or send an E-mail a user you trust abakharev 10:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Reblocked

- This ip# has been a long term source of persistant vanalism. example today Can we please do something about this more than short term blocks? -- Infrogmation 21:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been denied for the following reason(s):

see above for reasons

Request handled by: Pilot|guy 18:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove this template from your page.

Regarding edits made during July 8, 2006

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Tangotango 01:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:NMChico24, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WinHunter (talk) 05:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Achtung!

Regarding your comment [2] about inserting the link [3] on Goth subculture, you might like to read Wikipedia:External links. In particular, I believe it fails "any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes an example of brilliant prose" and "Any site that contains ... unverified original research" (e.g., "Goths often attract the sexually confused"). There are no end of "What is Goth" essays on personal homepages, there is no reason why this is more notable or worthy of inclusion.

Additionally, I'd suggest raising this up on Talk:Goth subculture rather than accusing other editors of vandalism. Mdwh 16:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 22, 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Tangotango 09:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Gramophone record

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Gramophone record, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. DVD+ R/W 05:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Gramophone record, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Allen 05:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Kusma (討論) 08:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../1/3/2/User_talk%7E132.33.132.19.html"