User talk:127

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk talk talk. 127 16:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Müller's method 2 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 3 Wikipedia_talk:Censorship 4 Re: 1/0 5 edit summary 6 Raichu 7 Teddy bears missed you 8 Rotary International

[edit] Müller's method

Hello, and welcome here. I just wanted to warn you that I reacted on your query at Talk:Müller's method. If you have any questions, you can ask me at my talk page. I look forward to your contributions. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I edited the article and made my response on its talk page. 127 17:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Threekingham Matrimandir Midway Airport (British Columbia) Quadratic irrational Chitra indica Central being Gabriel Pascal Collaboration (journal) Perdiccas III of Macedon West Hoathly Antipater II of Macedon Rough sex Choices (Buffy episode) Pranab Amyntas IV of Macedon Al-Ghafir A Hard Road Supermind Brahmasphutasiddhanta

Cleanup Linearized gravity Mirapuri Superconvergence Merge American Airlines Flight 924 Iraqi Special Tribunal List of English words of Yiddish origin Add Sources Comparison of display technology Harry Novak Jim Newman Wikify Communication models Polish 2nd Armoured Brigade Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office Expand Lanczos algorithm Francophobia Poisson integral formula

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: 1/0

Although I have used computers and the internet for a long time, I'm somewhat naïve when it comes to community participation. For whatever reason, I didn't think that such a carefully crafted (or maybe rapidly improvised) response would occur...no hostility even! Ardric47 03:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] edit summary

sorry... 1st edit. getting in over my head a bit. --Sshankar 12:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Raichu

THANK YOU! ALL OF MY REAL-LIFE FRIENDS TEASE ME BEACAUSE MY FAV POKEMON IS RAICHU!Raichu 17:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Teddy bears missed you

[edit] Rotary International

Hello, would you be so kind to give me the link of the discussion you opened. The Village Pump is too complex and big. I cannot SEE all. I propose you another solution. For the moment we NEED to see at least some example of the link, so I replace the header. I cannot locate myself on the page alone without it.

I reverted your blanks. I had too many censure from Rotarians to allow what you do. Again today, a person came and removed even the "Folklorical" critics (as Hamas), despite the pages made by Rotary itself onto it.

1/ as I am blind almost, I propose you another solution. For the moment we NEED to see at least some example of the link. So you stop reverting and we open the discussion, but you give me the exact link in the Village Pump. What you gave me is the general URL, and the Village Pump is too complex for my reader and even for a person who helps me. 2/ As I said you, the structure I did (with a header) does not give a problem at all in the French Wiki since monthes I propose that YOU let it like that (stop reverting) and THEN open a discussion, as PERSONNALLY I CANNOT SEE ALL the examples in the list, as I am disabled myself. The majority is not an argument, as in other langages it is not a problem, and as Rotary club as 4 millions of members, which are perfectly active as you may remark. Thank you. PierreLarcin2 02:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I well noticed your warning today about Rotary.

The problem is that I have sight problems and can't work all these changes without the help of a friend without a lot of work. So I use major changes by cut-paste, which is only practicable.

I have strong problems with many "rotarian-type" users, and I try first - to take apport about actual congress in cOpenhagen in consideration in my critics - to have an apport about the Duarte affair, who allowed women to join Rotary, with the help of supreme court. All this is justified by multiple links, and I am regularly blanked by two or three users, who just blank, without any justification. More of all, same blanks for links between some rotarians and segregationism, which founded (stupid) rumors for links between Ku Klux Klan and Rotary. I brought links, but they are systematically. More, I received some allusions to my French origins.

The last user seems a belgian student sent in Italy, like done by Rotarian programs.

In conclusion, dialog started AFTER multiple edit war by user Bridesmill. I want to launch an RfC (already spoke with Angela about that), and a arbitration request. These are prepared, but it is a huge work for us.

Thank you for your consideration, PierreLarcin2 19:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Well no, but thank you very much anyway for proposal. No protection needed I think. Rotarians are very clever by selection. To think about it shows that it is a club of public relations, so...

I believe in dialog. Obviously I receive some partial insults, etc, and also some info (for example the IP 10:29, 16 June 2006 85.82.166.107 who added a communication in front of Rotarian actual Congress). The real problem is this : first Internet is a way to communicate, second Rotary goes in schools for actions, third scholars use Wikipedia a lot, fourth the question is to make an opinion. I would not protect, because having negative points based on facts does oblige (if I may say) the Rotarians to add more positive facts, which opens it in a way, which gives more info : it is a closed club. So dialog is positive. I will not ask sanctions, just a warning because wikipedia is not a showroom, just a way to improve science and also science in human matters (sociology). This huge text for my claim at arbitration :-) PierreLarcin2 20:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi 127. Could you consider mediating on Rotary International? If User:PierreLarcin2 is a believer in dialogue, he's hiding it very well in my opinion. And far worse, he's ruthlessly indulging in personal attacks accusing all those him of being Rotarians and conservatives; his last message.. well, you judge. [1]--Aldux 20:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)