User talk:123wiki123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello 123wiki123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!  Netsnipe   ►  18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

[edit] Unblock request

This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jigahurtz". The reason given for Jigahurtz's block is: "sockpuppet of DeathSeeker as per Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/DeathSeeker".

Declined per [1] --  Netsnipe   ►  04:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: ""Multiple usernames are really only a problem if they are used as a method of troublemaking""

Decline reason: "Please provide evidence that you were not troublemaking. -- ЯEDVERS 21:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "The reason I was blocked wasn't for trouble making, it was for tagging my alternate account with the alternate account template, see above for link"

Decline reason: "This was a block based on the fact that the alternate account is an account used to evade a block placed on some other account. All of this is concurrent with WP:SOCK and WP:BPRyūlóng (竜龍) 02:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith. After reviewing your case further, I now believe that I had acted a bit hastily in blocking you. You started editing Xbox 360 after the block on DeathSeeker (talk · contribs) had already expired for WP:3RR violations using the account Jigahurtz (talk · contribs), thus you did not violate Wikipedia:Sock puppetry and I also acknowledge that your recent editing to Xbox 360 do not appear to have been as disruptive as those that resulted in DeathSeeker's earlier blocks. You were also forthright about acknowledging the link between this account and Jigahurtz, though technically, you really should have stated that this is an alternate account of DeathSeeker since that was your original account. As long as you do not resume editing Wikipedia disruptively using both accounts in tandem and you disclose their nature, then I see no reason to block you. I regret any inconvenience caused by my earlier misjudgement.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe   ►  18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)



[edit] Old Nintendo template


pt:Predefinição:Nintendo


[edit] Old Halo Template

v  d  e
Halo
Games: Halo: Combat EvolvedHalo 2Halo 3Halo WarsUntitled Halo Project
Other: Halo: Custom EditionI Love BeesMultiplayer gametypes in Halo 2
Novels: The Fall of ReachThe FloodFirst StrikeGhosts of OnyxGraphic Novel
Booklets and extras: Conversations from the UniverseCortana Letters
Music and film: Halo Original SoundtrackHalo 2 Original Soundtrack, Vol 1 & Vol 2Halo (film)
Fictional elements: Halo universeInstallationsForerunnerUNSCCovenantFlood
Characters: Master ChiefCortanaArbiter343 Guilty SparkProphetsGravemindMore...
Machinima: Red vs. BlueFire Team CharlieThe CodexThis Spartan Life

[edit] Hex168

Please see the talk page regarding the redirect. Hex168 was a short lived marketing campaign enacted in conjunction with the console's launch. Xbox 360 launch covers all the relevant information on this website, there is no need for a seperate article to replicate said info. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edit warring

I have asked Netsnipe to reapply your block, since you are engaged in exactly the same sort of sockpuppetry and 3RR violations that got you into trouble in the first place. Also, I've reported your most recent 3RR violation here. Regards, Nandesuka 23:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] XBox 360

The original editor's edit was perfectly acceptable. Your revert (which you've now stretched into a WP:3RR) was unwarranted. You do not WP:OWN this article. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

I have reported your latest 3RR violation here. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[2] made on November 27, 2006 to Xbox 360

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 1 week, considering the fact that you just came off of a 72-hour block. Khoikhoi 06:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)