Talk:Ásatrú/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] wuotanism

i've heard that guido von list founded a type of odinism (referred to as "wuotanism") that is different than the odinism practiced by many other odinists. Gringo300 01:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wasn't Guido von List very Right-Wing?

guido von list has been described as racist and anti-semitic. the thing about the term "right-wing" is that it can mean COMPLETELY different things in different contexts. the same is probably true of the term "left wing".

from what i've read, his wuotanism is considered to be a type of gnosticism. Gringo300 01:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) ________________________________________________________________________________________________

I've had to remove a certain link twice. The "Asatru Knotwork" site has virtually nothing to say about Asatru. Its primary reasons for existence appear to be a) as place to hang advertisements, and b) for the author to congratulate himself for using open source software. I get the impression that the author is very young and enthusiastic, and doesn't understand what kinds of content are appropriate here. His website is extremely inappropriate. If he wants it to be otherwise, he needs to put a few years into developing some real Asatru-related content. --Steven T Abell 18:08, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

"Ásatrú was revived in the 20th century."? The first(?) revival was in the late 19th century, then again in the 1920s and then in the 1960s. // Liftarn

I noticed that Odinism redirects to Asatru. Are there not any differences between the two, or are they just too minute to warrant separate articles? It may be difficult to describe the differences objectively in an article, but in my experience, people who use the label "Odinist" are usually much less concerned with the more ritualistic aspects of the religion. For them it usually seems to be more of a philosophical and cultural approach to the Northern Way. And if I remember correctly, that's how Else Christensen ran The Odinist and the Odinist Fellowship. RL Barrett 22:27 May 9, 2003 (UTC)

The comment was placed in the middle of the article -- it really belongs in the talk page:

Did the Viking Age really begin with the Norse raid on the Lindisfarne Priory in England in 793 AD, or a few years earlier when Charlemagne executed thousands of Asatru noblemen in northern Germany and chopped down their sacred groves?

About this: These noblemen wouldn't have identified themselves as Asatru, which is a modern construct. They may have recognized the term Heathen. - Yngwin 12:41 May 15, 2003 (UTC)

Isn't there a great deal of White supremacism and Aryan brotherhood philosophy in the American Asatru movement? RickK 06:46, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)

There are a number of people and organizations with both strong Ásatrú and white supremacist interests, yes. It's a different question whether this is a case of you getting chocolate in my peanut butter or me getting peanut butter in your chocolate. My own very limited understanding is that most heathens are contemptuous of the white supremacist stripe, are annoyed they get so much attention, and wish they would just go away. Salsa Shark 23:03, 6 Jan 2004 (UTC)
I think more of this should be mentioned. Many Americans understand "Odinism" as almost a code-word for a sort of neo-Nazism based on pagan religious beliefs, similar to the "blonde beast" sort of "Aryan" mythos, and this seems to be how some white-supremacists in Scandinavia understand it (some of the "neo-Nazi" musical groups in Sweden and Norway draw primarily from Norse mythology rather than from Nazi imagery). Certainly this is not what "Odinist" necessarily means, but the issue should be discussed and clarified. But I don't know enough about it to do so. --Delirium 10:59, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)


Most Americans, if asked, would be unfamilar with the terms "Odinism" and "Asatru" alike, much less any distinction between them. (Although Asatru did come up in the media during the late 1990s regarding the controversy over Kennewick Man... the Asatru Folk Assembly's claim to KWM as an ancestor was even front page news in The Washington Post. EikwaR
As an Ásatrú myself, I can say that it, being a religion, is not linked to any political movement whatsoever. Indeed there are a lot of right wing extremists who call themself Ásatrú or Odinist, but most of them don't have a clue what it's about. Freedom and brotherhood are among the highest virtues in Norse Heathen vision, where hatred is one of the most rejectable emotions. Real Heathens don't hate any other group of individuals, not based on race, or colour or faith. Some Heathens have negative feelings about Christians, since they are responsible for many innocent deaths during witch hunts, and for Charlemagne excecuting many Saxon heathens. Heathens against Hate is a website which aims at destroying any negative rumours about Heathenry based on right wing extremists. There is a number of reasons why many white supremacists choose to call themself Heathen:
  • Having a shared heritage with other germanic / white / aryan people increases the kinship within such a group.
  • Hitler is said to have been an occultist.

the orginal nazism was heavily involved in occultism. Gringo300 02:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • It is an easy way to gain members by seeking out devoted Heathens and talking them into nationalism..* Nationalism is being proud at ones nation or people, but can also be about a religion.
  • The religion is very tightly linked to the race they feel so proud about to be.
Many non extremist Heathens agree to the last point, believing that this religion, having evolved in this culture, is the best religion for the culture to have, since it is a mirroring of the culture. Heathenry is the best religion for Germanic / Norse people, since it is based on their culture and values, where, for example, Christianity isn't. Other way around, Heathenry isn't a good choice for Japanese, who have there own distinct culture, and should seek out their ancestral religion.
Isn't that special? According to such doctrine, I must be prohibited from all religions, since I am a mere mongrel-dog of breeding and not of any pure lineage. Dogface 16:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
I hope that this small talk has giving You an insight in the links between Ásatrú / Odinism and White Supremacism. Be it known that although I am a devoted heathen, I do not share white supremacist thoughts. To the last point, I can agree, although for me the right of freedom weights more for me. Anyone wanting to become Germanic heathen would be fine with me, although I would advise them to seek out their own roots first. Also know that I have no desire insulting someone here, so if anyone feels insulted, please accept my honest apologies. (BrahnTelpefin 23:40, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC))

Should we merge this with Norse mythology? Kwertii 05:41, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I don't believe so. Listed on there, maybe -- but not merged. There are enough people who follow this belief system to keep it seperate. I'm also not entirely sure it falls under the "mythology" realm, since it is an active belief system. I might not be completely on target about that, though. --Wolf530 15:28, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Nazis

Asatru is mentioned as "often linked with" Neo-Nazism on Nazi mysticism. These allegations should be mentioned here, and either be substantiated or debunked. dab (ᛏ) 12:57, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

satanism is also often linked to neo-nazism. ironically, the two seedline branch of christian identity claims that jews are the descendants of satan. Gringo300 02:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dormancy

I have done some research about the dormancy of this faith. One of the sources is an excellent recently published book written by the Swedish folklore scholar Ebbe Schön (Asa-Tors hammare). It appears that the faith was only marginalized and that Swedish farmers continued to talk about Thor, Odin, Frey, Freya and Balder into the 20th century. I know from my own district that farmers in the 20th century had oral traditions about how to perform a blot ritual (see Trollkyrka). Would it then be correct to say that Christianity forced it into dormancy? Marginalized seems to be a better term.--Wiglaf 21:31, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] US/UK Spelling

This article contains a combination of US and UK spelling (for example, "honour" but "organization"). One or the other should be chosen and applied consistently. — Ливай | ☺ 06:17, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It's worth noting that not only is organization an accepted spelling in the United Kingdom, but (IIRC) it's actually the spelling that comes first in the Oxford English Dictionary, which prefers -ize to -ise. Binabik80 04:17, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] cleanup

nobody seems to be looking after this article, and it is deteriorating. maybe it should have a cleanup tag. It is a hodge-podge reflecting the use of the term in general. It seems to equate Asatru with Germanic paganism, while it should be about Neo-paganism exclusively, and make clear the separation between the different kinds. Afaik, the Icelandic Asatru do not want to be associated with other groups using the name, and many Neo-pagan groups shun the term Asatru, because of the esoteric mish-mash that went under the name in the USA. This article should focus on detailing these controversies, and plotting their history, and cleanly list the various groups, rather than rambling about ancient Germanic traditions. 'Asatru' is late 19th century coinage, and therefore we should focus on 19th-20th century developments here. dab (ᛏ) 13:14, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Complete Rewrite?

- How about this as a skeleton for further writing?

Ásatrú (Icelandic), sometimes rendered Asatru (American), Åsatru (New Norse) or Åsatro (Bokmål) appears first in anthropological and historical works by Scandinavian scholars such as Sophus Bugge, who translated the Sæmundar Edda from archaic norse to then-modern riksmål in 1867. By some modern historians considered an anachronism, the term was used to describe the ethnic practices, traditions and rituals of the germanic language groups as a uniform, monolithic belief system in opposition to christianity.

The idea of an Ásatrú, with Norwegian nationalists among the most vocal proponents, played a minor role in the ideological construction of the Scandinavian nation-states, as well as theromantic myth of the Viking-barbarian. A number of small occultist or nationalist groups in European communities around the world are known to have attempted to revive the religion, but these attempts most likely came to an abrupt end when the Nazi party in Germany began monopolizing the various sacred symbols and trappings of German rural culture. In Scandinavia, the idea fell from grace as a result of being adopted and exploited for propaganda purposes by the hated Quisling regime of Norway. One curious case can be found in Australia, where a small number of people identifying as Odinists were harshly persecuted on the suspicion of Nazi sympathies.

While the Ásatrú meme was carried by a small number of academics of all political stripes, and upper middle class of the right-wing nationalist establishment of the European mainland, it took a very different form on Iceland, which considered itself independent of and apart from the process that assimilated other norse communities into the medieval and, later, industrialized European mainstream. Having preserved the norse language, customs and [|norse literature|literature]], and recently reclaimed the oldest surviving manuscript containing the Snorri Edda from the Danes, a movement arose adopting the term Ásatrú as a description of the authentic folk religion of the Icelenders. In 1972, the Icelandic Ásatrúarfélagið was made formal by Sveinbjörn Beinteinsson and associates. Similar organizations have been established in other Scandinavian countries, and are increasingly winning recognition as authentic practitioners of an ethnic religion. As Ásatrú spreads beyond Iceland and Scandinavia, the curious brand of political extremism it seems to inspire or attract has followed in its trail. Ásatru, formerly associated with the left, new age, Tolkien enthusiasts and the youth revolution of the 60's, is increasingly being appropriated by elements of the extreme right.

[edit] Official status in Iceland

I took out the part about Asatru being recognised as the official state religion of Iceland, what it was probably meant to say was that it got official recognition as a religious organization. It's a group on the extreme fringe of Icelandic society, the official state religion is the Iceland National Church (Þjóðkirkja) which is Lutheran. You're basically born into it and need to take certain steps to be taken off the books as an official Christian.

[edit] Non-standard characters

There is some discussion & debate over this at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Old Norse/Old Icelandic/Old English), but in general, I was under the impression that the article titles should always use the standard 26-letter English alphabet (plus numbers, where appropriate), as opposed to any accents, graves, or other diacritical marks. (See Wikipedia:Naming conventions.) Personally, I know next to nothing of Norse spellings or romanizations; I write primarily Japan-related entries. Still, see Kyoto rather than Kyōto, and Tokyo as opposed to Tōkyō. LordAmeth 00:51, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Use of Potentially Confusing Words

I would appreciate some definitions of terms used in this article; many of the words used here are potentially very ambiguous, charged with a multiplicity of meanings. For example, the word "heathen" is used repeatedly, with no explanation of how the term is being applied. Is it to mean non-Christian? Some particular form of Pagan ritual? Dirty? Alien to the state religion? Many religious words have multiple meanings, and sometimes you can have contradictory meanings in a single word. For a much better example than I could possibly enumerate without taking up MUCH too much space on this talk page, please reference religioustolerance.org. Tyro the Kinky Kitty

[edit] Too much specificity?

Lately (June 2005) there have been a number of changes/additions regarding the tenets of Asatru that may not be quite correct. While it may be that the information is correct with respect to the group the person making the changes travels in, it is far from clear to me that these are all necessarily the "dominant" form. Part of the difficultly, of course, is that there is no central authority and the religion is practiced differently from region to region.

While, for example, belief in the existence of the gods and goddesses as something other than a figment of the worshipper's imagination might be "marginalized and derided" in some groups, I'm not certain that it is correct to say that position is in the minority among those who call themselves heathen or Asatru. As a statement, it suggests a higher level of orthodoxy than I believe is really present. But hey, I'm not the most well-informed of people, if you can back it up go ahead and cite a source.

Reading what has been written, one might wonder if most Asatru adherents are 20 year old male agnostic SCA members in a Nordic-themed social club. In my opinion, that is a rather limited view.

Therefore, I urge less specificity in the portion of the article outlining the general religious tenets of Asatru adherents.

[edit] White Supremacy

The issue of white supremacy needs to be addressed more directly. A single sentence referencing a minority with white supremacist views doesn't address the key issue, which is that there is a widespread POV that sees the term "Odinism" as code for white supremacy. It's perfectly alright to explicitly distance the racist "Odinists" from Asatru practitioners, and it might call for a separate article, but that widespread perception needs to be brought up. -- 67.50.35.176, 8/20/05

[edit] disambiguation

I've tried some disambiguation of the term, but I'm running out of time now. This article should only deal with Icelandic Ásatrú, and refer to other organizations self-describing as Ásatrú. Afaik, the Icelanders are quite unhappy that USians often use Ásatrú as a generic term for Germanic paganism. Material relating to historical Germanic paganism should go on Germanic paganism. Material on Germanic Neopaganism should go on Forn Sed (Germanic Neopaganism), information about particular organizations on their own articles, such as Odinic Rite. Ásatrú and Odinic Rite are not synonyms; one is an Icelandic organization, and the other a British organization (with chapters abroad). Germanic Neopaganism needs its own, generic article. dab (ᛏ) 13:28, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

  • I wonder if creating some type of disambiguation page would help preserve the outline that you describe?

[edit] Recent Resurrection and Archival of Talk Page

I have obviously ressurected the Asatru entry from it's demise. I have Archived the lengthy Talk page. I commented on my motivations over at Germanic Neopaganism and did not get a reply from whom ever is stewarding this entry. My thinking is thus:

Asatru should fall under Germanic Reconstructionism, Germanic Heathenry or just Asatru. Here is why:

Doing a Google search of "Germanic Neopaganism" turns up only 142 hits. Doing a Google search of "Germanic Heathenry" turns up 2,640 hits. Doing a Google search for "Odinism" turns up 26,800 hits. Doing a Google of "Asatru" turns up 431,000 hits. I feel that the term "Germanic Neo-Paganism" is factually incorrect & misleading and I advocate reverting the re-directs unless a reasonable explanation is offered.

Asatru has been a legally recognized religion in the United States since 1972. "Germanic Neo-Paganism" has not.

Also, "pagan" is felt to be a perjorative term by many Asatruar. The term "pagan" was primarily used by the Romans and later the Roman Catholics to deride the country folk who worshipped the old Gods while the city folk had all been converted to monotheistic xianity. Just like the Greeks used the word "barbaroi" to describe non-Greeks, Muslims call non-Muslims "infidels" and Jews use "gentile" or "goyim" - these are all considered perjorative by the groups being demonized - including modern Asatruar.

Sources:
The word heathen was first documented by Bishop Ulfilas (311-382) - in the first translation of the Bible from Greek to Gothic. The closest we can ascertain, the term "heathen" meant a polytheist who worshipped on/ or lived on the heath. Other than seasonal gatherings at the temples blót were outdoors (on the heath or in sacred groves).This was specifically referred to and forbiden by the church fathers. There were also specific Germanic tribes - the Heathobards (Beowulf lines 2032 & 2067 in my version) and the Heathoreams (among other tribes) whose names attest to the fact that the term "heathen" or "heath dweller" predates Ulfilas.

The term "heathen" was coined and used exclusively regarding Germanic indigenous religion and cultural practices in it's original context. Later, when the Bible was translated into Modern English, the term "heathen" was used rather than the Latin pagan because the people who would be reading it spoke a Germanic tongue. Also note that Irish Monks referred to the vikings specifically as heathens - not pagans.

Thus, in a historical context, Heathen refers exclusively to those who follow the reconstructed Pre-xian religion of Northern Europe.

The Vikings in Irish Chronicles, 794-902 is a very interesting database citing all known entries in the Irish annals referring to Vikings during a 108 year period during the heighth of the Viking age. The annals were huge. Just the references to the Vikings are around 94 pages long.

  • The word Heathen occurs 172 times.
  • The word Dane occurs 72 times.
  • The word Northmen occurs 44 times.
  • The word Pagan occurs 2 times, but not as a descriptor for the Vikings but for their "pagan-like" activities.

Thus, in a historical context, I think the facts bear out that "heathen" refers to those who follow the indigenous religion(s) or tribal practices of the pre-xian Northern Europeans. As such Germanic_Neopaganism is incorrect both historically as well as in modern common usage, just by the sheer discrepancy in the usage of the terms shown on google. As indicated by Google hits, there appears to be far more adherents and self-declared Asatruar in the English speaking world than there are in Scandinavia.

I think that perhaps there is a conflict of interest here, and I ask whomever has taken the stewardship and spokesperson role for these entries to please identify themselves and their motivations.

Other Sources Cited:

Also, there seems to be some blatant advertising for Northvegr in this entry as well as at the entry for Germanic Neopaganism. Since Northvegr does not identify themselves as Asatru and states they are a secular non-profit organization, I have to question the obvious advertising of this group here. they even have their own entry, while much older and larger groups do not. I am going to omit the blatant Northvegr Foundation plug in the first paragraph, but leave an external link at the bottom of the page. -HroptR 00:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


ok, HroptR, I agree with this "resurrection". We just have to be clear about the articles' scope now:

  • this article is about all organizations self-describing as "Asatru". We explicitly say in the intro that the term is sometimes used in a wider meaning, and for that refer to the Germanic Neopaganism article
  • Germanic Neopaganism is the central article about all variants of revival of pre-Christian Germanic religions, including but not restricted to those self-describing as "Asatru".
  • Íslenska Ásatrúarfélagið is the article about "Asatru proper", the Icelandic organization.

This means that this article is strictly confined to the Icelandic and American "Asatru" organizations (and, such others as there are, I suppose it would be splitting hairs to exclude the Swedish Asatro. Afaik, there is no "Asatru" organization in Germany. http://asatru.de is owned by a Neonazi organization. This is more or less domain-squatting, since they do not claim to be an "Asatru" organisation. The reason I am so emphatic about this is that many European Neopagans consciously stay away from the term, (a) because they do not want to imply to practice a specifically Icelandic religion (and everybody has of course lots of respect for the Icelandic felagidh), and/or (b), because they want to avoid unsavoury associations from non-Icelandic organizations labelling themselves "Asatru". Every organization is of course free to choose any label they want. I just want to make sure that only those who actually did pick "Asatru" as a label do also appear here. dab (ᛏ) 12:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

No problem. I have to question the removal of the Troth and tha AFA who both self-identify as Asatru (sans Euro diacritical marks). Also, the Asatru Alliance is not in Britain - they are based out of Arizona, USA.
The Troth:
Troth Main Page: We in the Troth practice the Germanic/Norse religion of Heathenry, commonly referred to as Asatru.
The Asatru Folk Assembly:
Declaration of Purpose:The practice, promotion, development, and dissemination of the religion of Asatru.-HroptR 19:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
ah, yes, please feel free to point this out in the article. We may be reaching a point where the distinction between the terms blurs (which brings us back to the original question, do we really need an "Asatru" article different from "Germanic Neopaganism"?) -- for the moment, I think it is best to emphasize that "Asatru" refers to the Old Norse/Eddaic religion specifically (as opposed to "Germanic" in the wider sense). The crux of the matter is, most people, including Neopagans, do not give a shit about the distinction. Which doesn't mean that it isn't there and shouldn't be noted in an encyclopedia, of course. dab (ᛏ) 20:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
The AFA, the Troth and the Alliance are Asatru ogrnaizations themselves, but they accept members from the broader "Germanic Heathen" millieu. It is blurry... I think the crux of the problem is that there are not many sources outside of the Scandinavian material to really reconstruct anything. So if these groups want to practice indigenous Frisian religion or the folkway of Gotland, they are basically required to either give up because there are no materials or use Scandinavian medieval and clerical sources. Many of these groups see Asatru as a denomination of a greater indigenous Northern European religion - recognizing regional and temporal variations. This is a theory based on the works of Håkon Melberg, HR Ellis Davidson, Georges Dumézil and others... I understand your statement about people not identifying or recognizing variations, but in the "hard recons" in the USA that is hardly the case. The reverse seems true. It seems someone somewhere is trying to ressurect the folk beliefs and dialects of every backwater and sub-gen that ever existed in Northern Europe even if they are only mentioned once in Tacitus. (Most of this current is in the Theodish /Thiodisc realm).-HroptR 21:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
yes, I agree with all you say. My whole point for Germanic Neopaganism was that the title should be the correct, neutral, self-explanatory term, and these points could then be discussed in the article body. On Wikipedia, after all, we have the "principle of least surprise", meaning that not every religion can get their own self designation as their article title; choice of title is, rather, to be done from an outside, neutral point of view. "Germanic Neopaganism" imho is an entirely correct and uncontroversial term for the whole phenomenon taken together. As soon as we begin to speak of "Asatru", explanations become necessary. We seem to agree on the gist of these explanations, but that doesn't change the fact that they are needed. dab (ᛏ) 21:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../%C3%A1/s/a/Talk%7E%C3%81satr%C3%BA_Archive_1_b4fb.html"